Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
sauzet [2019/05/06 13:57] adrian [2008] |
sauzet [2019/05/17 09:59] adrian [2008] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 357: | Line 357: | ||
| * **Puligny Combettes** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, but fruit seems subdued, bit disappointing for what it is. way outshone by a 2008 Chassagne Caillerets from Ramonet. Advanced? (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Combettes** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, but fruit seems subdued, bit disappointing for what it is. way outshone by a 2008 Chassagne Caillerets from Ramonet. Advanced? (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| * **Puligny Garenne** (Jan 2019): not oxidized, lovely [Adrian Latimer] | * **Puligny Garenne** (Jan 2019): not oxidized, lovely [Adrian Latimer] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019): not oxidized, taught, mineral, austere, super (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| + | * **Puligny Combettes** (May 2019): after the Referts & Perrieres. Another odd bottle, the darkest colour (just) of the 3. No obvious pox, but just tatses of caramel, flat, no fruit or minerality or lift. Very advanced - certainly way below par (again)? (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| + | |||
| ===== 2009 ===== | ===== 2009 ===== | ||
| * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer) | ||