Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
fevre [2018/03/14 12:41]
127.0.0.1 external edit
fevre [2019/03/02 03:48]
adrian [‍‍‍2008]
Line 464: Line 464:
   * **Chablis Vaillons** (Oct 2012): not oxidized [MLT]   * **Chablis Vaillons** (Oct 2012): not oxidized [MLT]
   * **Chablis Montmains** (Oct & Dec 2011): young & very fine (Adrian Latimer)   * **Chablis Montmains** (Oct & Dec 2011): young & very fine (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Chablis Mt de Milieu** (May-Aug 2018): 3 fine & good (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Chablis Fourchaume**(May-Dec 2018): x 3 - fine, austere (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Chablis Vaudésir** (Aug 2015): Fresh, not bad at all [ER]   * **Chablis Vaudésir** (Aug 2015): Fresh, not bad at all [ER]
   * **Chablis Vaudésir** (Jan 2018): not oxidized, good [ER]   * **Chablis Vaudésir** (Jan 2018): not oxidized, good [ER]
-\\ + \\  
 ===== ‍‍‍2008 ===== ===== ‍‍‍2008 =====
  
Line 486: Line 489:
   * **Chablis les Clos** (Dec 2016): not oxidized but rather muted (Kent M)   * **Chablis les Clos** (Dec 2016): not oxidized but rather muted (Kent M)
   * **Chablis Preuses** (January 2017): Over the past 4 years I have opened 11 bottles. About half have been oxidized - several were undrinkable (KentM)   * **Chablis Preuses** (January 2017): Over the past 4 years I have opened 11 bottles. About half have been oxidized - several were undrinkable (KentM)
 +  * **Chablis Valmur** (Feb 2019): bright yellow, nice Chablis nose but palate flat, drying, still drinkable (just) but definitely too advanced (Adrian Latimer)
 \\  \\ 
 ==== ‍‍‍**2009** ==== ==== ‍‍‍**2009** ====
  • fevre.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/08/22 17:38
  • by jammywine