Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- dauvissat_vincent [2018/11/23 20:07]
rayner.cheung [2002]
+++ dauvissat_vincent [2019/03/08 10:26]
adrian [2010]
@@ Line 235: / Line 235: @@
   * **Chablis Vaillons** (Nov 2014) very advanced - borderline oxidized. Got worse with air. (R DeAngelo)
   * **Chablis Vaillons** (Aug 2017): 2 bottles--very oxidized, per se. [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
-====== 2001 ======
+===== 2001 =====
   * **Chablis Clos**(Dec 2008 and July 2009): two bottles; more forward than the 2000 Clos but still fresh and excellent [David Honig]
@@ Line 271: / Line 271: @@
   * **Chablis Clos**(26 July 2010): not oxidized and excellent [Suzanne Camhi]
   * **Chablis Clos**(Aug 2010 through June 2011): Several bottles from two sources, none oxidized, ranging from very good to brilliant [David Honig]
-  * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Nov. 2017 – ): 6 btls not oxidized. Not decanted. Still an adolescent in terms of color & nose; brilliant wine, delicious to drink. 2 lots of 3 each purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Oct. 2015 & Apr. 2016. Dauvissat–Camus label. [Rayner Cheung]
+  * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Nov. 2017 – Nov. 2018): 6 btls not oxidized. Not decanted. Still an adolescent in terms of color & nose; brilliant wine, delicious to drink. 2 lots of 3 each purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Oct. 2015 & Apr. 2016. Dauvissat–Camus label. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Les Clos** (March 2018): several bottles at Tour d'Argent all fine (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Chablis Forest**(01 Aug 2005): not oxidized [Carl Steefel]
@@ Line 400: / Line 400: @@
   * **Chablis** (May 2017): not at all oxidized; quite young and acidic [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
   * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2012): not oxidized. Dauvissat-Camus label. [MLT]
-  * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 1 btl oxidized. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Apr. 2016. [Rayner Cheung]
+  * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 2 btls oxidized + 1 btl not oxidized. The color, nose, & palate of the good btl all suggested a young, concentrated wine that is perhaps 1 – 2 years from reaching its plateau of maturity. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Apr. 2016. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2010): not oxidized [Alan Weinberg]
   * **Chablis Forest**(July 2011): not oxidized [Thomas Gratton]
@@ Line 437: / Line 437: @@
   * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll]
   * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell]
-  * **Chablis "Les Preuses"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 1 btl oxidized. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
+  * **Chablis "Les Preuses"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 1 btl not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btl was slow to reveal its charms, but turned out to be magnificent. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer)
@@ Line 443: / Line 443: @@
   * **Chablis Clos** (May 2018): fine (Adrian Latimer)
+===== 2012 =====
+  * **Chablis Vaillons** (March 2019): super (Adrian Latimer)